Podcast: SJ 225: RuPaul; Top Chef; Big Brother; Brooklyn 99; Will & Grace; Schitt’s Creek; Grand Tour; Happy Death Day 2 U; Isn’t It Romantic

White Background LogoSwanner and Judd talk about RuPaul; Top Chef; Big Brother; Brooklyn 99; Will & Grace; Schitt’s Creek; Grand Tour; Happy Death Day 2 U; Isn’t It Romantic.

Left Click To Listen, Right Click Here To Download


Isn’t It Romantic


Swanner:  Rebel Wilson plays Natalie, a girl who was told by her mother (Jennifer Saunders) at a young age that romantic comedies were all lies, because girls like her would never meet that great guy to sweep her off her feet. As an adult, all things romantic repels her. On her way home, trying to fight off a mugger, she hits her head. When she wakes up she finds herself caught in a romantic comedy where she’s the leading lady. She has to remember how to get through a romantic comedy to get back to her real life.

Director Todd Strauss-Schulson along with writers Erin Cardillo, Dana Fox, and Katie Silberman bring everything Rom Com to the film; sudden dance numbers, music montages, overly gay best friend, and even making sure the language stays PG-13. Liam Hemsworth plays Blake, the handsome client who barely notices her in the real world, but in a rom com he experiences love at first sight. Adam Devine (Pitch Perfect), is her friend Josh who secretly longs for her, but her jaded attitude about love prevents her from seeing him that way.

This is a very funny and clever movie. Wilson was the right actress for the role because she’s less likely to play the same roles that Julia Roberts or Sandra Bullock would play, making the awkwardness all the more pronounced. The cast really embraced the roles and never seem like they’re out of place. If you love romantic comedies like I do, then you’ll have a lot of fun with this film, if you hate them, you’ll still have a good time.

Swanner: 3 ½ stars

Happy Death Day 2 U


Judd: Happy Death Day 2 U is the sequel to 2017’s Happy Death Day a PG-13 Halloween horror movie that was better than I anticipated, but still not great. In the first movie, a girl named Tree is caught in “Groundhog Day” like loop, where everyday she wakes up in a boy’s room and ends up murdered at the end. At the end of the first film, Tree learns who her killer is, survives the night and breaks the cycle – or so we think.

Swanner: We find out that the loop that Tree was caught in was caused by Carter’s roommate Ryan. He was working on a machine that was playing with time and dimension. When he fires up the machine again, Tree gets thrust into a different dimension where things are very different. She still has her knowledge of her original dimension and realizes she can stay in this new world if she wants.

Judd: It’s a twist that works, so much so that the exact same twist has been used in the second season of Hulu’s Future Man. The problem with all time travel movies is that the more you think you them, the less sense they make. Happy Death Day 2 U gives a very superficial explanation, then gets on with the killings. While Tree is living the same day as the first movie in an alternate reality, she must also help Ryan solve the problem with his machine before the Dean shuts the whole experiment down – not exactly a fresh take.

Swanner: With all it’s flaws the movie is still very entertaining. I haven’t seen the original since we saw it last year but everything felt familiar enough that I was noticing the differences as Tree did. If you think about it, in these time loop films you do end up seeing the basic film quite a few times. Christopher Landon wrote and directed the film and brought the same sense of humor and fun back as he did with the original. This isn’t a film to figure it out, it’s a film to entertain and it does.

Judd: I will agree that the movie is light and fun, I don’t think it had the same amount of humor the first one had. In the first, Tree is a bitch and half the fun is trying to figure out who killed her. This time around, the humor comes from the nerds trying to fix the machine, but they’re secondary characters and don’t get much screen time. This time around, Landon was trying for “feels” with the storyline about Tree’s mother. They should have stuck with the humor.

Swanner: 2 ½ stars
Judd: 2 stars

What Men Want

sc-mov-what-men-want-taraji-movie-review-0206.jpgSwanner: Ali Davis (Taraji P. Henson) is a successful female sports agent in a high profile agency. Every time there is a promotion it goes to a male counter part even though her clientele is larger and more prestigious. While at a bridal shower Ali meets a psychic who has her drink some tea that gives her the ability to her mens thoughts. Adam Shankman (Hairspray) directs this R rated comedy remake.

Judd: Having never seen the original, but knowing this is a remake being released in February with Kellan Lutz on the cast list, I went in with extremely low expectations. The movie takes off and earns it’s R rating right off the bat, with F bombs flying left and right as Ali proves that she’s comfortable being in the boys club, and in it to win it.

Swanner: Henson does well at filling the role. She out bitches her gay assistant, she out drinks her girlfriends and she gets what she wants in the bedroom. Raised by a single father (Richard Roundtree) she’s use to handling things like a man, so once she can hear what men thinks it changes who she is and how she approaches situations. If gives her character a nice arch.

Judd: That’s not to say that the movie was perfect. Kellan Lutz appearance was unnecessary. Some of the gay jokes and gay-themes were almost unforgivably homophobic, even though there is a very positive storyline that is included, as well. And, the movie runs a little long.

Swanner: It was a bit too long but it stayed consistently funny. It’s always nice to see a funny R rated female driven comedy, there just aren’t enough of them. It’s also nice seeing Henson being funny. The rest of the cast is great and Aldis Hodge is awfully nice to look at. I did see the original, yet can’t remember a thing about it. Maybe this story is suppose to be topical for the time, and maybe years from now I won’t remember this film either but I still laughed a lot and had a good time. 

Judd: This is definitely a disposable, late winter movie and will be forgotten by the beginning of Spring, but I agree, it was funny and not nearly as bad as I thought it would be. 

Swanner 2 ½ stars
Judd: 2 stars

The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part


Swanner: It’s been five years since everything was awesome and the citizens are now facing a huge new threat: LEGO DUPLO® invaders from outer space, wrecking everything faster than it can be rebuilt. Emmet, Lucy and others are taken to a unexplored world where where everything is a musical. The film brings back most of the original voices and adds Tiffany Haddish and Allison Brie for more fun.

Judd: Phil Lord and Christopher Miller deliver the sequel script, but direction has been taken over by Mike Mitchell (Shrek Forever After; Alvin and The Chipmunks: Chipwrecked). Because I haven’t seen the original since the first time I saw it, the second feels much faster, much song-ier, but less entertaining.

Swanner: I felt like I was in overload. I know there is a storyline but it was so fast that only when the film switches back to real life is when it drops to a realistic pace. The introduction of Rex Dangervest, also voiced by Chris Pratt,  was also a fun addition. Rex is a combo of Pratt’s franchise characters calling himself a Galaxy defending archeologist, cowboy, and raptor trainer…Is he the new Indiana Jones?

Judd: The problem I had with the script is that you know what the ending will be. With a run time of 1h 46m, there is a lot of filler that doesn’t go any where, and by the time we got to the “twist”, I was bored in spite of being totally overstimulated. Also, many of the songs went to Tiffany Haddish as Queen Watevra Wa’Nabi, and it is reasonable to say her voice is less than suited for singing.

Swanner: It’s like we’re sharing the same brain. I remember really liking the first film. It was original and clever that made it something very special, but now we’ve seen a few of these films and it just seems like more of the same. The film is way too long and like you mentioned, so much of it feels like filler. I love musicals but I don’t think I could handle another musical number. At this point if they can’t recharge whatever this genre is then maybe it’s time to retire the franchise. 

Swanner: 2 stars

Judd: 2 stars

Podcast: SJ 223: This Is Us; Modern Family; Will & Grace; Fresh Off the Boat; Cool Kids; The Conners; RuPual; The Orville; Future Man; Schitt’s Creek; Grand Tour; Jakob Ogawa; The Kid Who Would Be King

White Background LogoSwanner and Judd talk about This Is Us; Modern Family; Will & Grace; Fresh Off the Boat; Cool Kids; The Conners; RuPual; The Orville; Future Man; Schitt’s Creek; Grand Tour; Jakob Ogawa; The Kid Who Would Be King.

Left Click To Listen, Right Click Here To Download